This group is for everyone who like tanks, sci-fi tanks, real tanks, funny tanks, you can put here tank mods, tank maps, simply everything with straps, armor and gun :D

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Media RSS LOL UNBALANCED T80 VS M1A1
Comments
DEathgod65
DEathgod65 Jun 1 2011, 4:27am said:

Realistic Combat Scenario :P

+7 votes     reply to
IceViperLat
IceViperLat Jun 1 2011, 4:46am replied:

dont know about relastic,but m1a1 or m1a2 vs t90a scenarion,t90 will win...just because if americans will use standart projectiles,t90 will hit them from 4 km range:\ but NO thats not true...i heared from american tankmens how 1 abrams shooted 1305719823479234 t72s in iraq and afgan...;(((

+3 votes     reply to
aidas2
aidas2 Jun 1 2011, 5:58am replied:

Well the new era on the T90 was made specificaly against american m829a3 sabot rounds and the T90 can fire it's 4 atgms further than the abrams can even target, it's a much smaller, harder to hit. And the abrams haves no active protection when everyone else does. I'd place my bet on the T90.

+1 vote     reply to
IceViperLat
IceViperLat Jun 1 2011, 6:03am replied:

of course on t90,no other way...long time ago i erased abrams from my tank list,leopard2,merkava,t90 theese are tanks...

and you know how its funny when russian uran projectile hits american uran armor,and then US tankmans dies because of radiation:DDDDD

+2 votes     reply to
The_Integral
The_Integral Jun 1 2011, 9:18pm replied:

Why do so many people here not understand that depleted uranium is not radioactive...

+2 votes     reply to
IceViperLat
IceViperLat Jun 2 2011, 4:44am replied:

actually it is:D only not outside but inside levels,dont know about "kill" concentration,but this **** not gonna give to you good mood,forget about armor,uranium projectiles are really harmful to the crew:\

+2 votes     reply to
aidas2
aidas2 Jun 3 2011, 3:01am replied:

It is a bit radioactive, but it wont kill you, but when the tank gets hit and du starts pouring out or catches fire, its classified as nuclear waste, hence why rad teams all way from america are called in to salvage abrams wrecks and then dig them with nuclear waste somewhere in the desert...

+1 vote     reply to
IceViperLat
IceViperLat Jun 3 2011, 10:57am replied:

nuclear waste,like this classification-american tanks=nuclear waste:DDD

+1 vote     reply to
Panzert
Panzert Jun 3 2011, 10:35pm replied:

Do you have a source for this DU armour catching fire?

+1 vote     reply to
IceViperLat
IceViperLat Jun 5 2011, 11:40am replied:

Sorry eng isnt my first language,what you mean?
But anyway what i am talkin about Uran-the strongest carcinogen like any heavy metal,crashing into the armor, uranium is sublimated and it is enough just to breathe the air, as in a few years gonna die from lung cancer:))))so cool

+1 vote     reply to
aidas2
aidas2 Jun 5 2011, 1:51pm replied:

There are some combat reports and tanker stories about some atgm hitting the front armor and white smoke coming out of it, the crew had to bail, because another shot would have set it on fire.

+1 vote     reply to
Panzert
Panzert Jun 6 2011, 9:13am replied:

I'm just curious about this because the closest possible reference to DU catching fire was this.

Quote:When a DU bullet or shell strikes a target, the uranium catches fire. Typically, 50-70% of the uranium is vaporized, releasing a mist of fine uranium dioxide dust particles. The immediate area becomes heavily contaminated. Depending on the size and duration of the fire, uranium dust could spread significant distances downwind. Unless contaminated vehicles and soil are quickly collected and isolated, the uranium will spread throughout the environment.

source: Peacecouncil.net

But that was about ammuntion. It almost seems more likely that the abrams you're talking about was HIT by a DU round.

+1 vote     reply to
aidas2
aidas2 Jun 6 2011, 2:04pm replied:

I can't find a source now but it was definately hit by some newer russian atgm.

+1 vote     reply to
Woozle
Woozle Oct 21 2011, 12:31pm replied:

But all of this is irrelevant as Russia and America are best buddies right now lol.

+1 vote     reply to
Franmar_The_Great
Franmar_The_Great Jun 26 2012, 10:26pm replied:

From T90 to nuclear waste to countrys.. quite the argument

+1 vote     reply to
ʇɐuʞɐʇǝp
ʇɐuʞɐʇǝp Jun 17 2011, 1:43am said:

What game?

+1 vote     reply to
Foxfort
Foxfort Jul 11 2011, 7:15pm said:

Abram M1 tank was made in 1980 in response of Soviet T-72,why were Iraq's T-72 easily destroyed,not talking about mayor A-10 and cobra/apache scored kills?

First: Think what has improved in past 8 years, especialy in military equipment? Yes, a lot of things. And M1 is made in 1980 and T-72 in 1972.

Second: M1 Abrams (1980) and T-80 (1980) is what should have been compared or M1a2 and T-90

Peace out.

+1 vote     reply to
aidas2
aidas2 Jul 18 2011, 4:58am replied:

Those Iraqi T72's were simple watered down polish export copies, like 20% of what the real T72 was back then. The Iraqi asad babil tank was pretty much a carbon copy of the crappy export version t72, what do you expect, it's like exporting abrams with no electronics, old munitions, weakest possible configuration and putting it up against latest T90m's.

+2 votes     reply to
Foxfort
Foxfort Jul 27 2011, 12:37pm replied:

I don't know what kind are Iraq's T-72, but I've heard a lot that they used old munitions. One thing is for sure it's much easier to find and kill a tank when a satellite scan is giving your everything about enemies.

+1 vote     reply to
Woozle
Woozle Jul 29 2012, 11:54pm said:

It looks like dawn of war, without the pathfinding issues.

+1 vote     reply to
Post a Comment
click to sign in and comment

Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.

Details
Type
Entertainment
Date
Jun 1st, 2011
Length
00:50
Filename
swfoc_2011-05-27_23-04-20-27_1.avi
Options
URL
Embed
Share
Subscribe
RSS Feed